Blog 009: Bye-Bye Bell: the end of an era.
Hello anyons: the new era
Blog 009: INTRODUCTION
httpvh://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9VCmryD34I
Han Geurdes Disproves Bell’s Theorem
httpvh://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kIysfrByZHE
Joy Christian Disproves Bell’s Theorem Parts 1 and 2
httpvh://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rq1vXQTrtSg
httpvh://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABnIvcvn2bc
My Sub-quantum 2D spins are Anyons
httpvh://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PcwQWa-rV9Y
INTRODUCTION
Bryan Sanctuary
In this entry I will present the evidence that shows that Bell’s inequalities have no consequences for understanding quantum vs. classical correlations. I will also show that spin is a two dimensional anyon.
After a summary, two recent proofs are presented that show BELL’S INEQUALITIES are incorrect due to an over simplistic treatment of spin by Bell. Finally I relate these approaches to my sub-quantum 2D spins.
httpvh://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8EbBasYGb_E
Where quantum mechanics fits.
Last time I discussed a bit about how scientists view Nature at molecular dimensions. One of the reasons scientists think that quantum mechanics is a complete theory of the microscopic is because it is capable of explaining all objective data. Well as we will see, not quite all. There is one experiment that causes trouble but otherwise with no evidence of anything deeper. How can we know if a sub-quantum domain actually exists?
Requirements of a physical theory
The least we should expect from a physical theory is that it is consistent with reality; completely explains all phenomena; and deterministically allows for events to be predicted from some initial cause. We also should expect interactions to be local.
Quantum mechanics fails in all these.
Recent Comments
(6 hours ago)
(1 weeks ago)
(1 weeks ago)
(8 weeks ago)
(9 weeks ago)